Companies Fight EFCL Winding Up

Spread the love

 

By Sue-Ann Wayow

COMPANIES and individuals, who are owed millions of dollars by debt-ridden Education Facilities Company Ltd (EFCL), and object to the winding up of the company, have until May 31 to file affidavits in court in opposition.

The Petition to wind up EFCL was heard virtually on Monday in the High Court before Justice Carol Gobin.

https://www.facebook.com/mfmptown

And by 15 June, EFCL has to file its affidavits in reply to those in opposition to the winding up.

A petition was presented to the High Court for the winding-up of the EFCL on February 28 which was the same date, a purported notice of termination to EFCL staff members, was circulated widely on social media.

Subsequently a notice was published in the newspapers advising that Justice Gobin was assigned to hear the winding-up petition and any creditor or contributory to the EFCL desiring to support or challenge the petition, was asked to attend the hearing either in person or through their attorney.

https://www.facebook.com/carvalhoscruiseservices

On Monday, there were 21 listed companies and individuals represented by either attorneys or themselves. Another 6, who were not listed to appear, also appeared.

Out of 21, there were several objections to the petition including from Tohmatsu Technologies Ltd, Benchmark Construction Ltd, Mikhail Heerasingh and Fitness Centre Ltd.

The Companies Act of T&T Chap. 81:01 (the ‘Companies Act’) provides for two overarching modes of dissolution or winding up, namely Winding Up by the Court (i.e. Compulsory Winding Up) and Voluntary Winding Up.

https://www.facebook.com/amnevarinvest

During the hearing, several lawyers including Prakash Ramadhar, Devesh Maharaj and Winston Seenath all contended that an initial seven-day period which was proposed to file the affidavits was not enough time given the complexities of the issue.

Ramdhar said, “It is not a simple issue of winding up.”

Justice Gobin eventually agreed to give one month’s time for creditors to file their affidavits.

After consensus, it was agreed that the next court hearing would be on July 4 at 10.15 by virtual means, after affidavits are filed and before legal submissions are ordered to be filed.

EFCL was represented by Senior Counsel Deborah Peake leading Ravi Heffes-Doon and Tamara Toolsie instructed by Savitri Sookraj-Beharry of Pollonais, Blanc, de la Bastide & Jacelon.

Creditors or their representatives who attended Monday’s hearing were: 

  • Contech Limited;

  • Mootilal Ramhit and Sons Contracting Ltd;

  • Lauriston Lewis Associates  Ltd;

  • Prudecon Ltd;

  • CE Management  and Services Ltd;

  • Wedge Trinidad Ltd;

  • Critical Engineering Solutions Ltd;

  • Tohmatsu Technologies Ltd;

  • Suncoast Enterprises Ltd;

  • Nadia Surujnath nee Narine;

  • Benchmark Construction Ltd;

  • Yorke Structures;

  • Hookmally Ali Ltd;

  • S Persad Contracting Services Ltd;

  • Mikhail Jared Aresh Heerasingh;

  • Heather Joseph;

  • Judy Nathai;

  • Therml Impac Affordable Homes Company Ltd;

  • CKID Construction Ltd;

  • Fitness Centre Ltd;

  • Atlantic Project Consultants Limited;

  • Quipcon Company Limited;

  • J B Contracting Limited;

  • Valens General Contracting Limited;

  • Rajkumar Ramkissoon; and

  • Super Industrial Services Limited.

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *